Failure data collected from the field (e.g., failure traces, bug reports, and memory dumps) represent an invaluable source of information for developers who need to reproduce and analyze failures. Unfortunately, field data may include sensitive information and thus cannot be collected indiscriminately. Privacy-preserving techniques can address this problem anonymizing data and reducing the risk of disclosing personal information. However, collecting anonymized information may harm reproducibility, that is, the anonymized data may not allow the reproduction of a failure observed in the field. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation about the impact of privacy-preserving techniques on the reproducibility of failures. In particular, we study how five privacy-preserving techniques may impact reproducibilty for 19 bugs in 17 Android applications. Results provide insights on how to select and configure privacy-preserving techniques.
Masserini, E., Ginelli, D., Micucci, D., Briola, D., Mariani, L. (2024). Anonymizing Test Data in Android: Does It Hurt?. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST 2024) (pp.88-98). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc [10.1145/3644032.3644463].
Anonymizing Test Data in Android: Does It Hurt?
Masserini E.;Ginelli D.;Micucci D.;Briola D.;Mariani L.
2024
Abstract
Failure data collected from the field (e.g., failure traces, bug reports, and memory dumps) represent an invaluable source of information for developers who need to reproduce and analyze failures. Unfortunately, field data may include sensitive information and thus cannot be collected indiscriminately. Privacy-preserving techniques can address this problem anonymizing data and reducing the risk of disclosing personal information. However, collecting anonymized information may harm reproducibility, that is, the anonymized data may not allow the reproduction of a failure observed in the field. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation about the impact of privacy-preserving techniques on the reproducibility of failures. In particular, we study how five privacy-preserving techniques may impact reproducibilty for 19 bugs in 17 Android applications. Results provide insights on how to select and configure privacy-preserving techniques.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3644032.3644463.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
896.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
896.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.