This chapter provides a theoretical contribution regarding the implications of adopting algorithms for monitoring workers’ health and well-being as a different form of control of their employers. Through a literature review and adopting an anti-deterministic view of the phenomenon within a theoretical framework informed by the STS approach, the chapter shows that the algorithmisation of workers’ health and well-being connects to the emergence of a selective form of paternalistic leadership. The proposed concept of selective paternalism points out how initiatives that challenge individual lifestyles and personal health needs and beliefs reinforce the introduction of the principle of selectiveness in the paternalistic style of leadership, diverging from the “duty” of inclusivity that characterised paternalistic employers. However, we argue, that the STS concepts of “affordance” and “appropriation” together allow us to see how employees and employers are not passive agents in front of algorithms, as they can appropriate them, thus leading to different potential interactional configurations between humans and algorithms.
Rossi, P., Tirabeni, L. (2024). The Algorithmisation of Well-Being Promotion: Towards a Selective Paternalism. In F. Miele, P. Giardullo (a cura di), Reframing Algorithms STS perspectives to Healthcare Automation (pp. 45-71). Palgrave Macmillan [10.1007/978-3-031-52049-5_3].
The Algorithmisation of Well-Being Promotion: Towards a Selective Paternalism
Rossi, Paolo;Tirabeni, Lia
2024
Abstract
This chapter provides a theoretical contribution regarding the implications of adopting algorithms for monitoring workers’ health and well-being as a different form of control of their employers. Through a literature review and adopting an anti-deterministic view of the phenomenon within a theoretical framework informed by the STS approach, the chapter shows that the algorithmisation of workers’ health and well-being connects to the emergence of a selective form of paternalistic leadership. The proposed concept of selective paternalism points out how initiatives that challenge individual lifestyles and personal health needs and beliefs reinforce the introduction of the principle of selectiveness in the paternalistic style of leadership, diverging from the “duty” of inclusivity that characterised paternalistic employers. However, we argue, that the STS concepts of “affordance” and “appropriation” together allow us to see how employees and employers are not passive agents in front of algorithms, as they can appropriate them, thus leading to different potential interactional configurations between humans and algorithms.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Rossi-Tirabeni-2024-Reframing Algorithms-Capitolo-VoR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: ROSSI TIRABENI 2024
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
291.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
291.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.