Colman proposes that the domain of interpersonal choice requires an alternative and nonindividualistic conception of rationality. However, the anomalies he catalogues can be accounted for with less radical departures from orthodox rational choice theory. In particular, we emphasize the need for descriptive and prescriptive rationality to incorporate recursive interplay between one's own choices and one's expectation regarding others' choices

Perugini, M. (2003). Second-order indeterminacy. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 26(2), 171-172 [10.1017/s0140525x03410054].

Second-order indeterminacy

Perugini, M
2003

Abstract

Colman proposes that the domain of interpersonal choice requires an alternative and nonindividualistic conception of rationality. However, the anomalies he catalogues can be accounted for with less radical departures from orthodox rational choice theory. In particular, we emphasize the need for descriptive and prescriptive rationality to incorporate recursive interplay between one's own choices and one's expectation regarding others' choices
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
game theory
English
2003
26
2
171
172
none
Perugini, M. (2003). Second-order indeterminacy. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 26(2), 171-172 [10.1017/s0140525x03410054].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/17159
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact