This paper aims at analysing the relationship between conscientious objection and Truth. Firstly, it will try to investigate dialectically the Truth-based approach to conscientious objection. Secondly, it will point out its main implications and moral premises in terms of theories of conscience. Thirdly, it will scrutinize two possible ‘logics’ of conscientious objection from the legal viewpoint. Eventually, the paper will point out the goals of the Truth-based approach and the positive law-based approach to conscientious objection, and their effects on contemporary democratic society.
Saporiti, M. (2016). ‘Quid est veritas?’: On Conscientious Objection and Truth. In A. Ferreira Leite de Paula, A. Santacoloma Santacoloma, G. Villa Rosas (a cura di), Truth and Objectivity in Law and Morals II. Proceedings of the Second Special Workshop held at the 27th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Washington DC, 2015 (pp. 165-171). Stuttgart : Franz Steiner Verlag.
‘Quid est veritas?’: On Conscientious Objection and Truth
SAPORITI, MICHELE
2016
Abstract
This paper aims at analysing the relationship between conscientious objection and Truth. Firstly, it will try to investigate dialectically the Truth-based approach to conscientious objection. Secondly, it will point out its main implications and moral premises in terms of theories of conscience. Thirdly, it will scrutinize two possible ‘logics’ of conscientious objection from the legal viewpoint. Eventually, the paper will point out the goals of the Truth-based approach and the positive law-based approach to conscientious objection, and their effects on contemporary democratic society.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.