The widespread need for standardized moral dilemmas has been increasingly motivated by the recent criticism raised against the stimulus material employed by Greene et al. (2001). The present study aimed at presenting a novel and standardized set of moral dilemmas, controlled for some relevant features that affect people's moral judgment. Specifically, in this study we provide the following normative data for 75 moral dilemmas (60 experimental dilemmas and 15 filler dilemmas): a) the percentages of affirmative responses to the resolution of the dilemma, b) the decision times, c) the judgments of moral acceptability to the resolution of the dilemma, and d) the affective ratings of Valence and Arousal. Copyright © 2013 by Società editrice il Mulino.
Manfrinati, A., Sarlo, M., Lotto, L. (2013). Un nuovo set di 60 dilemmi morali: dati normativi italiani per giudizi di accettabilità morale, tempi di decisione e valutazioni emozionali [A new set of 60 moral dilemmas: Italian norms for moral acceptability judgments, decision times, and affective ratings]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI PSICOLOGIA, 35(1), 211-228 [10.1421/73992].
Un nuovo set di 60 dilemmi morali: dati normativi italiani per giudizi di accettabilità morale, tempi di decisione e valutazioni emozionali [A new set of 60 moral dilemmas: Italian norms for moral acceptability judgments, decision times, and affective ratings]
MANFRINATI, ANDREAPrimo
;
2013
Abstract
The widespread need for standardized moral dilemmas has been increasingly motivated by the recent criticism raised against the stimulus material employed by Greene et al. (2001). The present study aimed at presenting a novel and standardized set of moral dilemmas, controlled for some relevant features that affect people's moral judgment. Specifically, in this study we provide the following normative data for 75 moral dilemmas (60 experimental dilemmas and 15 filler dilemmas): a) the percentages of affirmative responses to the resolution of the dilemma, b) the decision times, c) the judgments of moral acceptability to the resolution of the dilemma, and d) the affective ratings of Valence and Arousal. Copyright © 2013 by Società editrice il Mulino.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.