The paper is a critique of the attempt to define public spheres in analogy to the dynamics of tiny groups. It argues that public spheres are not psychological but discoursive phenomena that can be explained only using a comunicative approach.
Privitera, W. (2008). Comment on Fine, Harrington and Segre/2. Groups and Publics. SOCIOLOGICA, 1 [10.2383/26563].
Comment on Fine, Harrington and Segre/2. Groups and Publics
PRIVITERA, WALTER
2008
Abstract
The paper is a critique of the attempt to define public spheres in analogy to the dynamics of tiny groups. It argues that public spheres are not psychological but discoursive phenomena that can be explained only using a comunicative approach.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.