Due to the great increase in the non-thermal plasma (NTP) bio-applications, especially thanks to its antimicrobial properties, many types of NTP generating devices have been developed recently. However, a comparison of these devices is difficult due to the differences in the setup of studies testing them, e.g., in species of microorganisms used and sample preparations. In this study, we optimized a robust and reproducible standard protocol using Bacillus subtilis spores and applied it to compare seven different NTP generating devices in terms of technical parameters and sporicidal properties. Inhibition zones determined using the Aurora software and the complete inhibition of bacteria growth induced by the NTP treatment were analyzed to determine both local and overall effects, respectively. The highest sporicidal efficacy of the tested devices was achieved by the volume dielectric barrier discharge from Wroclaw, which inhibited 99.9% of colony forming units after 30 min of exposure. To our knowledge, a comparative study of this extent has not been published to date. The presented protocol is based on an established bacterial method and can therefore serve as a general standard for an effective comparison of NTP sources across laboratories worldwide.

Machkova, A., Zampieri, L., Czapka, T., Hrudka, J., Vankova, E., Khun, J., et al. (2025). Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 15(1) [10.1038/s41598-025-91279-3].

Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices

Zampieri L.;Martines E.;
2025

Abstract

Due to the great increase in the non-thermal plasma (NTP) bio-applications, especially thanks to its antimicrobial properties, many types of NTP generating devices have been developed recently. However, a comparison of these devices is difficult due to the differences in the setup of studies testing them, e.g., in species of microorganisms used and sample preparations. In this study, we optimized a robust and reproducible standard protocol using Bacillus subtilis spores and applied it to compare seven different NTP generating devices in terms of technical parameters and sporicidal properties. Inhibition zones determined using the Aurora software and the complete inhibition of bacteria growth induced by the NTP treatment were analyzed to determine both local and overall effects, respectively. The highest sporicidal efficacy of the tested devices was achieved by the volume dielectric barrier discharge from Wroclaw, which inhibited 99.9% of colony forming units after 30 min of exposure. To our knowledge, a comparative study of this extent has not been published to date. The presented protocol is based on an established bacterial method and can therefore serve as a general standard for an effective comparison of NTP sources across laboratories worldwide.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Bacillus subtilis; Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD); International study; Plasma jet; Reference (standard) protocol; Spores;
English
6-mar-2025
2025
15
1
7893
open
Machkova, A., Zampieri, L., Czapka, T., Hrudka, J., Vankova, E., Khun, J., et al. (2025). Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 15(1) [10.1038/s41598-025-91279-3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Machková-2025-Scientific Reports-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 2.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/548628
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact