Which social decisions are influenced by intuitive processes? Which by deliberative processes? The dualprocess approach to human sociality has emerged in the last decades as a vibrant and exciting area of research. Yet a perspective that integrates empirical and theoretical work is lacking. This review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing literature on the cognitive basis of cooperation, altruism, truth telling, positive and negative reciprocity, and deontology and develops a framework that organizes the experimental regularities. The meta-analytic results suggest that intuition favors a set of heuristics that are related to the instinct for selfpreservation: people avoid being harmed, avoid harming others (especially when there is a risk of harm to themselves), and are averse to disadvantageous inequalities. Finally, this article highlights some key research questions to further advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of human sociality.
Capraro, V. (2024). The Dual-Process Approach to Human Sociality: Meta-Analytic Evidence for a Theory of Internalized Heuristics for Self-Preservation. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 126(5), 719-757 [10.1037/pspa0000375].
The Dual-Process Approach to Human Sociality: Meta-Analytic Evidence for a Theory of Internalized Heuristics for Self-Preservation
Capraro V.
2024
Abstract
Which social decisions are influenced by intuitive processes? Which by deliberative processes? The dualprocess approach to human sociality has emerged in the last decades as a vibrant and exciting area of research. Yet a perspective that integrates empirical and theoretical work is lacking. This review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing literature on the cognitive basis of cooperation, altruism, truth telling, positive and negative reciprocity, and deontology and develops a framework that organizes the experimental regularities. The meta-analytic results suggest that intuition favors a set of heuristics that are related to the instinct for selfpreservation: people avoid being harmed, avoid harming others (especially when there is a risk of harm to themselves), and are averse to disadvantageous inequalities. Finally, this article highlights some key research questions to further advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of human sociality.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.