Objective: Custodiol® and St. Thomas cardioplegia are widely employed in mini-thoracotomy mitral valve (MV) operations. One-dose of the former provides 3 h of myocardial protection. Conversely, St. Thomas solution is usually reinfused every 30 min and safety of single delivery is unknown. We aimed to compare single-shot St. Thomas versus Custodiol® cardioplegia. Methods: Primary endpoint of the prospective observational study was cardiac troponin T level at different post-operative time-points. Propensity-weighted treatment served to adjust for confounding factors. Results: Thirty-nine patients receiving St. Thomas were compared with 25 patients receiving Custodiol® cardioplegia; cross-clamping always exceeded 45 min. No differences were found in postoperative markers of myocardial injury. Ventricular fibrillation at the resumption of electric activity was more frequent following Custodiol® cardioplegia (P =.01). Conclusion: Effective myocardial protection exceeding 1 h of ischemic arrest can be achieved with a single-dose St. Thomas cardioplegia in selected patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy MV surgery.

Barbero, C., Pocar, M., Marchetto, G., Cura Stura, E., Calia, C., Dalbesio, B., et al. (2023). Single-Dose St. Thomas Versus Custodiol® Cardioplegia for Right Mini-thoracotomy Mitral Valve Surgery. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 16(1), 192-198 [10.1007/s12265-022-10296-z].

Single-Dose St. Thomas Versus Custodiol® Cardioplegia for Right Mini-thoracotomy Mitral Valve Surgery

Marchetto G.;
2023

Abstract

Objective: Custodiol® and St. Thomas cardioplegia are widely employed in mini-thoracotomy mitral valve (MV) operations. One-dose of the former provides 3 h of myocardial protection. Conversely, St. Thomas solution is usually reinfused every 30 min and safety of single delivery is unknown. We aimed to compare single-shot St. Thomas versus Custodiol® cardioplegia. Methods: Primary endpoint of the prospective observational study was cardiac troponin T level at different post-operative time-points. Propensity-weighted treatment served to adjust for confounding factors. Results: Thirty-nine patients receiving St. Thomas were compared with 25 patients receiving Custodiol® cardioplegia; cross-clamping always exceeded 45 min. No differences were found in postoperative markers of myocardial injury. Ventricular fibrillation at the resumption of electric activity was more frequent following Custodiol® cardioplegia (P =.01). Conclusion: Effective myocardial protection exceeding 1 h of ischemic arrest can be achieved with a single-dose St. Thomas cardioplegia in selected patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy MV surgery.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Cardiopulmonary bypass; Crystalloid cardioplegia; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve repair; Myocardial protection;
English
8-ago-2022
2023
16
1
192
198
open
Barbero, C., Pocar, M., Marchetto, G., Cura Stura, E., Calia, C., Dalbesio, B., et al. (2023). Single-Dose St. Thomas Versus Custodiol® Cardioplegia for Right Mini-thoracotomy Mitral Valve Surgery. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 16(1), 192-198 [10.1007/s12265-022-10296-z].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barbero-2023-Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: CC BY 4.0 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 664.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
664.13 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/522840
Citazioni
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
Social impact