Background: During the pandemic outbreak, helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was widely used as respiratory support for COVID-19 patients, inside and outside of intensive care units. The available literature suggests specific interventions to improve the comfort of patients treated with helmet-CPAP. Few reports are available on the experiences of patients undergoing this treatment. Aim: This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and recollections of COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet-CPAP. Study Design: We conducted semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from the follow-up programme for COVID-19 patients discharged from an Italian general intensive care unit. Participants were interviewed by telephone. Data analysis followed the principles of thematic synthesis approach. Findings: We conducted 29 phone calls in patients eligible for the study. Five participants declared that they did not remember the time spent in hospital on helmet-CPAP. Twenty-four patients were then included. Two themes and six subthemes were generated from their interview data: (1) The helmet-CPAP as a life-saving treatment (subthemes: recognition of the usefulness of treatment and resilience); (2) the negative feelings related to helmet-CPAP application (subthemes: communication problems, entrapment, mental confusion, fear of dying). Each patient's experience was unique, but some discomfort elements such as noise, gas flow turbulence, choking sensation and thirst were found to be very common. Conclusions: The application of helmet-CPAP treatment generated positive and negative memories and feelings in COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. The patients' experience has provided an overview of the main factors of discomfort. This can be a starting point for taking corrective measures to promote greater helmet tolerance and subsequent treatment success. Relevance to Clinical Practice: This study has provided an insight into the patient's recollections about helmet-CPAP treatment during a worldwide pandemic. The findings suggested strict applications of interventions aimed to reduce some issues that participants reported, to improve their compliance to treatment. Results from this study could help nurses in understanding the needs of patients treated with helmet-CPAP and may foster a care focused on patient-centred outcomes.

Lucchini, A., Villa, M., Fumagalli, L., Carra, A., Magri, D., Mariconti, I., et al. (2024). Patients' recollections of helmet-CPAP treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 29(1), 49-57 [10.1111/nicc.12951].

Patients' recollections of helmet-CPAP treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

Lucchini A
;
Giani M;
2024

Abstract

Background: During the pandemic outbreak, helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was widely used as respiratory support for COVID-19 patients, inside and outside of intensive care units. The available literature suggests specific interventions to improve the comfort of patients treated with helmet-CPAP. Few reports are available on the experiences of patients undergoing this treatment. Aim: This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and recollections of COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet-CPAP. Study Design: We conducted semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from the follow-up programme for COVID-19 patients discharged from an Italian general intensive care unit. Participants were interviewed by telephone. Data analysis followed the principles of thematic synthesis approach. Findings: We conducted 29 phone calls in patients eligible for the study. Five participants declared that they did not remember the time spent in hospital on helmet-CPAP. Twenty-four patients were then included. Two themes and six subthemes were generated from their interview data: (1) The helmet-CPAP as a life-saving treatment (subthemes: recognition of the usefulness of treatment and resilience); (2) the negative feelings related to helmet-CPAP application (subthemes: communication problems, entrapment, mental confusion, fear of dying). Each patient's experience was unique, but some discomfort elements such as noise, gas flow turbulence, choking sensation and thirst were found to be very common. Conclusions: The application of helmet-CPAP treatment generated positive and negative memories and feelings in COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. The patients' experience has provided an overview of the main factors of discomfort. This can be a starting point for taking corrective measures to promote greater helmet tolerance and subsequent treatment success. Relevance to Clinical Practice: This study has provided an insight into the patient's recollections about helmet-CPAP treatment during a worldwide pandemic. The findings suggested strict applications of interventions aimed to reduce some issues that participants reported, to improve their compliance to treatment. Results from this study could help nurses in understanding the needs of patients treated with helmet-CPAP and may foster a care focused on patient-centred outcomes.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
CPAP; experiences; feelings; helmet; recollections;
English
24-lug-2023
2024
29
1
49
57
reserved
Lucchini, A., Villa, M., Fumagalli, L., Carra, A., Magri, D., Mariconti, I., et al. (2024). Patients' recollections of helmet-CPAP treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 29(1), 49-57 [10.1111/nicc.12951].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lucchini-2024-Nursing in Critical Care-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/521619
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact