Eco-acoustic indices allow us to rapidly evaluate habitats and ecosystems and derive information about anthropophonic impacts. However, it is proven that indices' values and trends are not comparable between studies. These incongruences may be caused by the availability on the market of recorders with different characteristics and costs. Thus, there is a need to reduce these biases and incongruences to ensure an accurate analysis and comparison between soundscape ecology studies and habitat assessments. In this study, we propose and validate an audio recording equalization protocol to reduce eco-acoustic indices' biases, by testing three soundscape recorder models: Song Meter Micro, Soundscape Explorer Terrestrial and Audiomoth. The equalization process aligns the signal amplitude and frequency response of the soundscape recorders to those of a type 1 level meter. The adjustment was made in MATLAB R2023a using a filter curve generated comparing a reference signal (white noise); the measurements were performed in an anechoic chamber using 11 audio sensors and a type 1 sound level meter (able to produce a .WAV file). The statistical validation of the procedure was performed on recordings obtained in an urban and Regional Park (Italy) assessing a significant reduction in indices' biases on the Song Meter Micro and Audiomoth.

Potenza, A., Zaffaroni-Caorsi, V., Benocci, R., Guagliumi, G., Fouani, J., Bisceglie, A., et al. (2024). Biases in Ecoacoustics Analysis: A Protocol to Equalize Audio Recorders. SENSORS, 24(14) [10.3390/s24144642].

Biases in Ecoacoustics Analysis: A Protocol to Equalize Audio Recorders

Potenza A.
Primo
;
Zaffaroni-Caorsi V.;Benocci R.;Guagliumi G.;Bisceglie A.;Zambon G.
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Eco-acoustic indices allow us to rapidly evaluate habitats and ecosystems and derive information about anthropophonic impacts. However, it is proven that indices' values and trends are not comparable between studies. These incongruences may be caused by the availability on the market of recorders with different characteristics and costs. Thus, there is a need to reduce these biases and incongruences to ensure an accurate analysis and comparison between soundscape ecology studies and habitat assessments. In this study, we propose and validate an audio recording equalization protocol to reduce eco-acoustic indices' biases, by testing three soundscape recorder models: Song Meter Micro, Soundscape Explorer Terrestrial and Audiomoth. The equalization process aligns the signal amplitude and frequency response of the soundscape recorders to those of a type 1 level meter. The adjustment was made in MATLAB R2023a using a filter curve generated comparing a reference signal (white noise); the measurements were performed in an anechoic chamber using 11 audio sensors and a type 1 sound level meter (able to produce a .WAV file). The statistical validation of the procedure was performed on recordings obtained in an urban and Regional Park (Italy) assessing a significant reduction in indices' biases on the Song Meter Micro and Audiomoth.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
biases; eco-acoustic indices; equalization; recorder; soundscape;
English
17-lug-2024
2024
24
14
4642
open
Potenza, A., Zaffaroni-Caorsi, V., Benocci, R., Guagliumi, G., Fouani, J., Bisceglie, A., et al. (2024). Biases in Ecoacoustics Analysis: A Protocol to Equalize Audio Recorders. SENSORS, 24(14) [10.3390/s24144642].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Potenza-2024-Sensors-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 7.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.99 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/506681
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact