The article summarises the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hirsi Jamaa v Italy case and discusses its relevance under three profiles: definition of the concept of jurisdiction within human rights law; protection of migrants and asylum seekers; protection of human rights at sea

Papanicolopulu, I. (2013). Hirsi Jamaa v. Italy. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 107(2), 417-423 [10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0417].

Hirsi Jamaa v. Italy

PAPANICOLOPULU, IRINI
2013

Abstract

The article summarises the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hirsi Jamaa v Italy case and discusses its relevance under three profiles: definition of the concept of jurisdiction within human rights law; protection of migrants and asylum seekers; protection of human rights at sea
Nota a sentenza
human rights; refugees; European Court of Human Rights; push-back operations
English
2013
107
2
417
423
none
Papanicolopulu, I. (2013). Hirsi Jamaa v. Italy. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 107(2), 417-423 [10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0417].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/49295
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
Social impact