Background: Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) is the gold standard for evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF); however, its use is limited in everyday practice. We analyzed the use of CPET for HF management in the real world. Methods: From 2009 to 2022, 341 patients with HF underwent 12–16 weeks of rehabilitation in our Centre. We present data from 203 patients (60%), excluding those unable to perform CPET, those with anaemia and severe pulmonary disease. Before and after rehabilitation, we performed CPET, blood tests and echocardiography, tailoring individual physical training to the results of baseline test. The following variables were considered: peak Respiratory Equivalent Ratio (RER), peakVO2 (ml/Kg/min), VO2 at aerobic threshold (VO2AT,% maximal), VE/VCO2 slope, P(ET)CO2, VO2 /Work ratio (ΔVO2/ΔWork). Results: Rehabilitation improved peak VO2, pulse O2, VO2 AT and ΔVO2/ΔWork in all patients by about 13% (p < 0.01). Most patients (126, 62%) showed a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), but rehabilitation was effective also in patients with mildly reduced (HFmrEF: n = 55, 27%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF: n = 22, 11%). Conclusions: Rehabilitation in patients with heart failure induces a significant recovery of cardiorespiratory performance easily assessed by CPET, that is applicable to the majority of them and should be used routinely in the programming and evaluating of cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Baccanelli, G., Tomaselli, M., Ferri, U., Giglio, A., Munforti, C., Parati, G., et al. (2023). Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiopulmonary test parameters in heart failure: A real world experience. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND PREVENTION, 17(June 2023) [10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200178].
Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiopulmonary test parameters in heart failure: A real world experience
Baccanelli G.;Tomaselli M.;Ferri U.;Parati G.;Crotti L.;
2023
Abstract
Background: Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) is the gold standard for evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF); however, its use is limited in everyday practice. We analyzed the use of CPET for HF management in the real world. Methods: From 2009 to 2022, 341 patients with HF underwent 12–16 weeks of rehabilitation in our Centre. We present data from 203 patients (60%), excluding those unable to perform CPET, those with anaemia and severe pulmonary disease. Before and after rehabilitation, we performed CPET, blood tests and echocardiography, tailoring individual physical training to the results of baseline test. The following variables were considered: peak Respiratory Equivalent Ratio (RER), peakVO2 (ml/Kg/min), VO2 at aerobic threshold (VO2AT,% maximal), VE/VCO2 slope, P(ET)CO2, VO2 /Work ratio (ΔVO2/ΔWork). Results: Rehabilitation improved peak VO2, pulse O2, VO2 AT and ΔVO2/ΔWork in all patients by about 13% (p < 0.01). Most patients (126, 62%) showed a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), but rehabilitation was effective also in patients with mildly reduced (HFmrEF: n = 55, 27%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF: n = 22, 11%). Conclusions: Rehabilitation in patients with heart failure induces a significant recovery of cardiorespiratory performance easily assessed by CPET, that is applicable to the majority of them and should be used routinely in the programming and evaluating of cardiac rehabilitation programs.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.