Evidence on newborns’ discrimination of emotional facial expressions is scarce, and the question of what is the nature of the visual information that newborns rely on to perform such discrimination remains open. Here, we manipulated the spatial frequency (SF) content of the stimuli by selectively removing low spatial frequency (LSF) and high spatial frequency bands using newborn-appropriate cutoffs to investigate what information newborns use when preferring and discriminating between dynamic displays showing happy and fearful expressions unfolding over time. Using a preferential looking paradigm, in Study 1 (N = 63, 59% females, 92% White), we showed that newborns looked longer to happy over fearful expressions in unfiltered (broad spatial frequency) and high-pass (high spatial frequency.0.6 cycles per degree [cpd]) faces but not in low-pass (LSF, 0.5 cpd) faces. In Study 2 (N = 22, 59% females, 91% White), newborns tested in a visual habituation paradigm showed successful discrimination of the two LSF emotions. Results show that newborns can discriminate between dynamic images of happy and fearful facial expressions containing either extreme low SF (,0.5 cpd) information or higher SF (.0.6 cpd) bandwidth. Their preference for the happy expression was present for intact and high-pass filtered faces but not for low-pass faces. This SF effect is tentatively driven by an enhancement of attentional response to the LSF fearful face, whereas the response to the happy face is unaffected by the SF manipulation.

Silvestri, V., Arioli, M., Colombo, L., Porro, M., Macchi Cassia, V. (2024). The role of visual spatial frequencies in newborns’ processing of dynamic facial expressions of emotion. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY [10.1037/dev0001757].

The role of visual spatial frequencies in newborns’ processing of dynamic facial expressions of emotion

Silvestri, V;Arioli, M;Macchi Cassia, V
2024

Abstract

Evidence on newborns’ discrimination of emotional facial expressions is scarce, and the question of what is the nature of the visual information that newborns rely on to perform such discrimination remains open. Here, we manipulated the spatial frequency (SF) content of the stimuli by selectively removing low spatial frequency (LSF) and high spatial frequency bands using newborn-appropriate cutoffs to investigate what information newborns use when preferring and discriminating between dynamic displays showing happy and fearful expressions unfolding over time. Using a preferential looking paradigm, in Study 1 (N = 63, 59% females, 92% White), we showed that newborns looked longer to happy over fearful expressions in unfiltered (broad spatial frequency) and high-pass (high spatial frequency.0.6 cycles per degree [cpd]) faces but not in low-pass (LSF, 0.5 cpd) faces. In Study 2 (N = 22, 59% females, 91% White), newborns tested in a visual habituation paradigm showed successful discrimination of the two LSF emotions. Results show that newborns can discriminate between dynamic images of happy and fearful facial expressions containing either extreme low SF (,0.5 cpd) information or higher SF (.0.6 cpd) bandwidth. Their preference for the happy expression was present for intact and high-pass filtered faces but not for low-pass faces. This SF effect is tentatively driven by an enhancement of attentional response to the LSF fearful face, whereas the response to the happy face is unaffected by the SF manipulation.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
emotion processing; faces; newborns; spatial frequencies; visual preference;
English
2024
none
Silvestri, V., Arioli, M., Colombo, L., Porro, M., Macchi Cassia, V. (2024). The role of visual spatial frequencies in newborns’ processing of dynamic facial expressions of emotion. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY [10.1037/dev0001757].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/466816
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact