Data from single-cell mRNA sequencing are usually represented in a suitable feature space. Multivariate statistics and graph theoretic methods assign to each cell a time label known as pseudo-time and display paths in such space. For example, a process by which progenitors differentiate into one or more types of adult cells is described by a set of paths exhibiting branching points. Herewith the differentiation process is heuristically modelled by introducing a two-dimensional continuous time, autonomous dynamical system of polynomial type. An energy function F of two variables, {σ1,σ2}, is suitably defined; the autonomous dynamical system is obtained from ∇F and gives rise to a gradient flow. The corresponding phase portrait has two attractors, A and B, a saddle point, O, and a separatrix. The orbits of the system interpret experimental data points in feature (≡ state) space. These properties are suggested by data from single cell sequencing. Namely, initial states of the system correspond to progenitors; attractors A and B correspond to the two cell types yielded by progenitor differentiation; the separatrix and the saddle point make sure an orbit asymptotically reaches either A or B. The dynamical system setting replaces paths by orbits, assigns a unique orbit to each cell and enables time ordering as well as compliance with causality, unlike pseudo-time assignment induced by a minimum spanning tree.
Crosta, G. (2020). Progenitor Cell Differentiation As a Gradient Flow. In 2020 SIAM/CAIMS 2nd Joint Annual Meeting. Conference program and abstracts. (pp.1-1). Philadelphia, PA : SIAM.
Progenitor Cell Differentiation As a Gradient Flow
Crosta Giovanni Franco
Primo
2020
Abstract
Data from single-cell mRNA sequencing are usually represented in a suitable feature space. Multivariate statistics and graph theoretic methods assign to each cell a time label known as pseudo-time and display paths in such space. For example, a process by which progenitors differentiate into one or more types of adult cells is described by a set of paths exhibiting branching points. Herewith the differentiation process is heuristically modelled by introducing a two-dimensional continuous time, autonomous dynamical system of polynomial type. An energy function F of two variables, {σ1,σ2}, is suitably defined; the autonomous dynamical system is obtained from ∇F and gives rise to a gradient flow. The corresponding phase portrait has two attractors, A and B, a saddle point, O, and a separatrix. The orbits of the system interpret experimental data points in feature (≡ state) space. These properties are suggested by data from single cell sequencing. Namely, initial states of the system correspond to progenitors; attractors A and B correspond to the two cell types yielded by progenitor differentiation; the separatrix and the saddle point make sure an orbit asymptotically reaches either A or B. The dynamical system setting replaces paths by orbits, assigns a unique orbit to each cell and enables time ordering as well as compliance with causality, unlike pseudo-time assignment induced by a minimum spanning tree.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CrostaGF-2020-0706-Abstract.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Sunto della presentazione come accettato e pubblicato da SIAM
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
122.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
122.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
CrostaGF-2020-0706-CP1-9.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Presentazione n. 9 recitata alla sessione CP1, con didascalie
Tipologia di allegato:
Other attachments
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.