In recent decades, internet gambling has seen strong growth and diffusion due to intrinsic characteristics that make it particularly attractive to players (accessibility, anonymity, variety of games). This paper aims to present the current state of knowledge of the risk and protective factors of online gambling. A literature search conducted in the PubMed, PsychInfo, and Scopus databases found 42 articles, which were included in the review. Methodological aspects and risk and protective factors were analysed cross-sectionally. The results concerning risk and protective factors were distinguished by the level of analysis: individual, relational, and contextual. Two types of comparisons were considered: online vs. offline gamblers and online nonproblematic vs. problematic gamblers. The results of the two comparisons were juxtaposed to analyse their consistency and the different associations with factors. In general, the review showed that risk factors and variables at the individual level are investigated to a greater extent, while protective factors at the relational and contextual level need more in-depth study in future research. More specifically, this review found that even if online and offline gamblers shared most risk and protective factors, there are variables that they would not have in common. These factors could be important to consider in preventive interventions aimed at online gamblers and online problematic gamblers.

Ghelfi, M., Scattola, P., Giudici, G., Velasco, V. (2024). Online Gambling: A Systematic Review of Risk and Protective Factors in the Adult Population. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 40(2), 673-699 [10.1007/s10899-023-10258-3].

Online Gambling: A Systematic Review of Risk and Protective Factors in the Adult Population

Ghelfi, M
;
Velasco, V
2024

Abstract

In recent decades, internet gambling has seen strong growth and diffusion due to intrinsic characteristics that make it particularly attractive to players (accessibility, anonymity, variety of games). This paper aims to present the current state of knowledge of the risk and protective factors of online gambling. A literature search conducted in the PubMed, PsychInfo, and Scopus databases found 42 articles, which were included in the review. Methodological aspects and risk and protective factors were analysed cross-sectionally. The results concerning risk and protective factors were distinguished by the level of analysis: individual, relational, and contextual. Two types of comparisons were considered: online vs. offline gamblers and online nonproblematic vs. problematic gamblers. The results of the two comparisons were juxtaposed to analyse their consistency and the different associations with factors. In general, the review showed that risk factors and variables at the individual level are investigated to a greater extent, while protective factors at the relational and contextual level need more in-depth study in future research. More specifically, this review found that even if online and offline gamblers shared most risk and protective factors, there are variables that they would not have in common. These factors could be important to consider in preventive interventions aimed at online gamblers and online problematic gamblers.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
Online gambling; Prevention; Problem gambling; Protective factors; Review; Risk factors;
English
14-nov-2023
2024
40
2
673
699
open
Ghelfi, M., Scattola, P., Giudici, G., Velasco, V. (2024). Online Gambling: A Systematic Review of Risk and Protective Factors in the Adult Population. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 40(2), 673-699 [10.1007/s10899-023-10258-3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-451218_VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 866.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
866.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/451218
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact