Research on Human-Technology Interactions revealed that, under certain conditions, people instinctively interact with social robots in ways comparable to Human-Human Interactions. Indeed, people apply social perception schemas and attribute a mind to social robots, especially when they present anthropomorphic characteristics. Furthermore, under certain conditions, anthropomorphic social robots are awarded with moral consideration and participate to moral dyads. Thus, anthropomorphism facilitates social robots integration in people's lives. However, what is still unknown is whether adopting social schemas with social robots, in turn, affects how individuals perceive and interact with other people. To fill this gap, we experimentally investigated whether the type of mind attributed to anthropomorphic social robot, then, complementary influences the empathy towards a person in trouble. Participants (n = 269) interacted (vs. did not interact) through a chatbot with a highly (vs. lowly) anthropomorphic social robot, evaluated it on mind dimensions and, finally, expressed their empathy towards a person. Results demonstrated that anthropomorphism fosters the attribution of agency (anthropomorphic appearance and interaction through chatbot) and experience (anthropomorphic appearance only), which, in turn, significantly, but in opposite directions, affected empathy towards the social target. Im-plications and future research directions are outlined.

Spaccatini, F., Corlito, G., Sacchi, S. (2023). New dyads? The effect of social robots’ anthropomorphization on empathy towards human beings. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 146(September 2023) [10.1016/j.chb.2023.107821].

New dyads? The effect of social robots’ anthropomorphization on empathy towards human beings

Spaccatini, F
;
Corlito, G;Sacchi, S
2023

Abstract

Research on Human-Technology Interactions revealed that, under certain conditions, people instinctively interact with social robots in ways comparable to Human-Human Interactions. Indeed, people apply social perception schemas and attribute a mind to social robots, especially when they present anthropomorphic characteristics. Furthermore, under certain conditions, anthropomorphic social robots are awarded with moral consideration and participate to moral dyads. Thus, anthropomorphism facilitates social robots integration in people's lives. However, what is still unknown is whether adopting social schemas with social robots, in turn, affects how individuals perceive and interact with other people. To fill this gap, we experimentally investigated whether the type of mind attributed to anthropomorphic social robot, then, complementary influences the empathy towards a person in trouble. Participants (n = 269) interacted (vs. did not interact) through a chatbot with a highly (vs. lowly) anthropomorphic social robot, evaluated it on mind dimensions and, finally, expressed their empathy towards a person. Results demonstrated that anthropomorphism fosters the attribution of agency (anthropomorphic appearance and interaction through chatbot) and experience (anthropomorphic appearance only), which, in turn, significantly, but in opposite directions, affected empathy towards the social target. Im-plications and future research directions are outlined.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Anthropomorphism; Anthropomorphization; Dyadic completion; Human-technology interaction; Mind attribution; Social robot;
English
31-mag-2023
2023
146
September 2023
107821
none
Spaccatini, F., Corlito, G., Sacchi, S. (2023). New dyads? The effect of social robots’ anthropomorphization on empathy towards human beings. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 146(September 2023) [10.1016/j.chb.2023.107821].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/443323
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
Social impact