Representational flexibility is usually assessed in the graphic domain by whether children can innovate canonical drawings. According to the Karmiloff-Smith’s RR Model (RRM 1990), flexibility is acquired with a marked discontinuity at 8-9 years, when routine drawings are overcome once and for all. RRM, though, is inherently recursive, implying that innovation entertains a continuous trade-off with graphic conservatism along development. In this regard, a less recent model by van Sommers (1984) suggests that pictorial conservatism coexist with flexibility, even in adulthood, and that continuity models fit better flexibility development. This study aims at comparing the two models and their ability to predict the relationship between conservatism and flexibility during development. 75 children (5, 7, 9, 11 year-olds) and 20 adults were asked to draw two similar and two different houses (administration order balanced across the sample). Drawings were coded with a 5 point scale for 6 aspects (e.g. house’s structure and details). Results show that linear trends fit flexibility development in all aspects. Adults draw canonical houses more than older children, although score highly in the differentiation task. Results suggest that flexibility coexist with some conservatism even in adults, lending support to van Sommers’s model, in these regards.

(2003). Lo sviluppo della flessibilità rappresentazionale. (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2003).

Lo sviluppo della flessibilità rappresentazionale

DE FABRITIIS, PAOLA
2003

Abstract

Representational flexibility is usually assessed in the graphic domain by whether children can innovate canonical drawings. According to the Karmiloff-Smith’s RR Model (RRM 1990), flexibility is acquired with a marked discontinuity at 8-9 years, when routine drawings are overcome once and for all. RRM, though, is inherently recursive, implying that innovation entertains a continuous trade-off with graphic conservatism along development. In this regard, a less recent model by van Sommers (1984) suggests that pictorial conservatism coexist with flexibility, even in adulthood, and that continuity models fit better flexibility development. This study aims at comparing the two models and their ability to predict the relationship between conservatism and flexibility during development. 75 children (5, 7, 9, 11 year-olds) and 20 adults were asked to draw two similar and two different houses (administration order balanced across the sample). Drawings were coded with a 5 point scale for 6 aspects (e.g. house’s structure and details). Results show that linear trends fit flexibility development in all aspects. Adults draw canonical houses more than older children, although score highly in the differentiation task. Results suggest that flexibility coexist with some conservatism even in adults, lending support to van Sommers’s model, in these regards.
Tallandini Shallice, Maria
drawing; representational flexibility; graphic conservatism; van Sommers; Karmiloff-Smith; symbolic development
M-PSI/04 - PSICOLOGIA DELLO SVILUPPO E PSICOLOGIA DELL'EDUCAZIONE
M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALE
Italian
14-mar-2003
2002/2003
Psicologia
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
University College London
Tutor per gli aspetti statistici: Caudek, Corrado. Direttore del corso di dottorato: Patrizia Tabossi, Giorgio Vallortigara. Referenti: Anna Silvia Bombi (Università di Roma 'La Sapienza'), Norman H. Freeman (University of Bristol), Peter Howell (University College London).
(2003). Lo sviluppo della flessibilità rappresentazionale. (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2003).
open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A2_INDEX_PhD2002.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Doctoral thesis
Dimensione 97.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
97.41 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
DeFabritiis_PhDIntro.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Other attachments
Dimensione 84.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
84.05 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/36599
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact