The optimal dietary pattern to improve metabolic function remains elusive. In a 21-day randomized controlled inpatient crossover feeding trial of 20 insulin-resistant obese women, we assessed the extent to which two isocaloric dietary interventions—Mediterranean (M) and high protein (HP)—improved metabolic parameters. Obese women were assigned to one of the following dietary sequences: M–HP or HP–M. Cardiometabolic parameters, body weight, glucose monitoring and gut microbiome composition were assessed. Sixteen women completed the study. Compared to the M diet, the HP diet was more effective in (i) reducing insulin resistance (insulin: Beta (95% CI) = −6.98 (−12.30, −1.65) µIU/mL, p = 0.01; HOMA-IR: −1.78 (95% CI: −3.03, −0.52), p = 9 × 10−3 ); and (ii) improving glycemic variability (−3.13 (−4.60, −1.67) mg/dL, p = 4 × 10−4 ), a risk factor for T2D development. We then identified a panel of 10 microbial genera predictive of the difference in glycemic variability between the two diets. These include the genera Coprococcus and Lachnoclostridium, previously associated with glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance. Our results suggest that morbidly obese women with insulin resistance can achieve better control of insulin resistance and glycemic variability on a high HP diet compared to an M diet.

Tettamanzi, F., Bagnardi, V., Louca, P., Nogal, A., Monti, G., Mambrini, S., et al. (2021). A high protein diet is more effective in improving insulin resistance and glycemic variability compared to a mediterranean diet—a cross-over controlled inpatient dietary study. NUTRIENTS, 13(12) [10.3390/nu13124380].

A high protein diet is more effective in improving insulin resistance and glycemic variability compared to a mediterranean diet—a cross-over controlled inpatient dietary study

Bagnardi, V;Monti, GS;
2021

Abstract

The optimal dietary pattern to improve metabolic function remains elusive. In a 21-day randomized controlled inpatient crossover feeding trial of 20 insulin-resistant obese women, we assessed the extent to which two isocaloric dietary interventions—Mediterranean (M) and high protein (HP)—improved metabolic parameters. Obese women were assigned to one of the following dietary sequences: M–HP or HP–M. Cardiometabolic parameters, body weight, glucose monitoring and gut microbiome composition were assessed. Sixteen women completed the study. Compared to the M diet, the HP diet was more effective in (i) reducing insulin resistance (insulin: Beta (95% CI) = −6.98 (−12.30, −1.65) µIU/mL, p = 0.01; HOMA-IR: −1.78 (95% CI: −3.03, −0.52), p = 9 × 10−3 ); and (ii) improving glycemic variability (−3.13 (−4.60, −1.67) mg/dL, p = 4 × 10−4 ), a risk factor for T2D development. We then identified a panel of 10 microbial genera predictive of the difference in glycemic variability between the two diets. These include the genera Coprococcus and Lachnoclostridium, previously associated with glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance. Our results suggest that morbidly obese women with insulin resistance can achieve better control of insulin resistance and glycemic variability on a high HP diet compared to an M diet.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Dietary intervention; Glycemic variability; Gut microbiome; High protein diet; Insulin resistance; Mediterranean diet; Obesity;
English
2021
13
12
4380
open
Tettamanzi, F., Bagnardi, V., Louca, P., Nogal, A., Monti, G., Mambrini, S., et al. (2021). A high protein diet is more effective in improving insulin resistance and glycemic variability compared to a mediterranean diet—a cross-over controlled inpatient dietary study. NUTRIENTS, 13(12) [10.3390/nu13124380].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-341742_VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 994.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
994.68 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/341742
Citazioni
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
Social impact