In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded or their description.
Brugnatelli, V., Tibaldi, A. (2021). Reply to the comment on “Effects in North Africa of the 934–940 CE Eldgjá and 1783–1784 CE Laki eruptions (Iceland) revealed by previously unrecognized written sources”. BULLETIN OF VOLCANOLOGY, 83(8) [10.1007/s00445-021-01479-8].
Reply to the comment on “Effects in North Africa of the 934–940 CE Eldgjá and 1783–1784 CE Laki eruptions (Iceland) revealed by previously unrecognized written sources”
Brugnatelli, Vermondo;Tibaldi, Alessandro
2021
Abstract
In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded or their description.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021-Brugnatelli-Tibaldi_Article_ReplyToTheCommentOnEffectsInNo.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione
456.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
456.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.