Due to the ecotoxicological effects, microplastics are considered a threat for the marine environment. Recent reports indicate their presence not only in subsurface water and in coastal beach sediments, but also in the deep-sea. Notwithstanding, there is still not a scientific consensus about the analytical procedure to be applied for their determination. In this work we compared the performance of two extraction methods: pressurized solvent extraction (PSE) and density separation. Sea sand and seafloor sediments were spiked with known amounts of polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) microplastics and submitted to both the extraction procedures. Results showed that the PSE ensured higher recoveries for the smaller size particle fractions (89,2 ± 1.1% in the 50-150 μm range) whereas the density separation enabled precise recoveries for the larger size particles (SD = 1,5%). No significant differences in terms of blanks control were highlighted.

Stile, N., Raguso, C., Pedruzzi, A., Cetojevic, E., Lasagni, M., Sanchez-Vidal, A., et al. (2021). Extraction of microplastic from marine sediments: A comparison between pressurized solvent extraction and density separation. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 168(July 2021) [10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112436].

Extraction of microplastic from marine sediments: A comparison between pressurized solvent extraction and density separation

Raguso, Clarissa;Lasagni, Marina;Saliu, Francesco
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Due to the ecotoxicological effects, microplastics are considered a threat for the marine environment. Recent reports indicate their presence not only in subsurface water and in coastal beach sediments, but also in the deep-sea. Notwithstanding, there is still not a scientific consensus about the analytical procedure to be applied for their determination. In this work we compared the performance of two extraction methods: pressurized solvent extraction (PSE) and density separation. Sea sand and seafloor sediments were spiked with known amounts of polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) microplastics and submitted to both the extraction procedures. Results showed that the PSE ensured higher recoveries for the smaller size particle fractions (89,2 ± 1.1% in the 50-150 μm range) whereas the density separation enabled precise recoveries for the larger size particles (SD = 1,5%). No significant differences in terms of blanks control were highlighted.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Analysis; Extraction; Marine litter; Microplastics; Seafloor;
English
5-mag-2021
2021
168
July 2021
112436
reserved
Stile, N., Raguso, C., Pedruzzi, A., Cetojevic, E., Lasagni, M., Sanchez-Vidal, A., et al. (2021). Extraction of microplastic from marine sediments: A comparison between pressurized solvent extraction and density separation. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 168(July 2021) [10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112436].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stile-2021-Marine Pollution Bulletin-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 905.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
905.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/314513
Citazioni
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
Social impact