Introduction The UPDRS-IV represents the most common screening tool to assess motor fluctuations in patients with PD despite the lack of a clinimetric validation. Objectives We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of UPDRS-IV using a 12-h waking-day motor assessment as the gold standard. Methods We consecutively enrolled PD patients who underwent a 12-h waking-day motor assessment in the study. Patients were clinically evaluated every 2 h for 12 h using the UPDRS-III. Motor scores were reported as a line graph and six blinded raters classified patients as having or not having motor fluctuations. The UPDRS-IV was used in order to assess the presence of predictable and unpredictable motor fluctuations according to items 36–38. Results Sixty two PD patients were enrolled in the study. According to the raters’ evaluations, 39 (62.9%) were classified as having motor fluctuations, while according to the UPDRS-IV 47 (75.8%) presented a motor fluctuation giving a sensitivity of 87.2% (95%CI 72.6–95.7) and a specificity of 43.5% (95%CI 23.2–65.5). Conclusion Our study results confirm the high level of sensitivity with a lower level of specificity of UPDRS-IV to screen motor fluctuations in PD patients.
Raciti, L., Nicoletti, A., Mostile, G., Bonomo, R., Contrafatto, D., Dibilio, V., et al. (2016). Validation of the UPDRS section IV for detection of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 27, 98-101 [10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.03.008].
Validation of the UPDRS section IV for detection of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease
Bonomo R.;
2016
Abstract
Introduction The UPDRS-IV represents the most common screening tool to assess motor fluctuations in patients with PD despite the lack of a clinimetric validation. Objectives We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of UPDRS-IV using a 12-h waking-day motor assessment as the gold standard. Methods We consecutively enrolled PD patients who underwent a 12-h waking-day motor assessment in the study. Patients were clinically evaluated every 2 h for 12 h using the UPDRS-III. Motor scores were reported as a line graph and six blinded raters classified patients as having or not having motor fluctuations. The UPDRS-IV was used in order to assess the presence of predictable and unpredictable motor fluctuations according to items 36–38. Results Sixty two PD patients were enrolled in the study. According to the raters’ evaluations, 39 (62.9%) were classified as having motor fluctuations, while according to the UPDRS-IV 47 (75.8%) presented a motor fluctuation giving a sensitivity of 87.2% (95%CI 72.6–95.7) and a specificity of 43.5% (95%CI 23.2–65.5). Conclusion Our study results confirm the high level of sensitivity with a lower level of specificity of UPDRS-IV to screen motor fluctuations in PD patients.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Raciti_2016.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione
370.39 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
370.39 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.