This article consists in a comparison between Soumission by Michel Houellebecq (2015) and Cinacittà. Memorie del mio delitto efferato by Tommaso Pincio (2008) on the background of a milestone of dystopian tradition, 1984 by George Orwell. An analysis of the interactions between the characters, based on a ternary pattern – a dissenting leading character, his nemesis as the embodiment of the establishment, a female figure they both lust after – brings to light two constants, which can be found in all three novels though more or less dramatically so. One is that erotic love, as the most natural feeling, is the ultimate level of resistance in one’s personal independence ; the other one is that the final triumph of power always goes hand in hand with self-denial.
Keywords : George Orwell, Tommaso Pincio, Michel Houellebecq, dystopian novel. L’articolo propone un confronto tra Soumission di Michel Houellebecq (2015) e Cinacittà. Memorie del mio delitto efferato di Tommaso Pincio (2008), sullo sfondo di una pietra miliare della tradizione distopica, 1984 di George Orwell. Dall’analisi dell’interazione fra i personaggi, fondata su un disegno ternario – un protagonista portatore di dissenso, un antagonista espressione del sistema vigente, una figura femminile oggetto di desiderio – emergono due costanti, declinate nei tre romanzi a vari gradi di intensità drammatica. Il primo è che l’eros, nella sua spontaneità, rappresenta l’estrema linea di resistenza dell’autonomia individuale ; il secondo è che il definitivo trionfo del potere coincide sempre con la negazione del « tu ».
Barenghi, M. (2019). Oltre 1984: Tommaso Pincio e Michel Houellebecq. LA MODERNITÀ LETTERARIA, 12, 103-114.
Oltre 1984: Tommaso Pincio e Michel Houellebecq
Barenghi, ML
2019
Abstract
This article consists in a comparison between Soumission by Michel Houellebecq (2015) and Cinacittà. Memorie del mio delitto efferato by Tommaso Pincio (2008) on the background of a milestone of dystopian tradition, 1984 by George Orwell. An analysis of the interactions between the characters, based on a ternary pattern – a dissenting leading character, his nemesis as the embodiment of the establishment, a female figure they both lust after – brings to light two constants, which can be found in all three novels though more or less dramatically so. One is that erotic love, as the most natural feeling, is the ultimate level of resistance in one’s personal independence ; the other one is that the final triumph of power always goes hand in hand with self-denial.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.