We study an airport cost function with a four-random components stochastic frontier model that split the inefficiency in two parts: (1) persistent (long-run) and (2) temporary (short-run). We analyze as determinant of both inefficiency types several exogenous factors such as the airport ownership and LCCs share. We apply the model to the Italian airport system during the period 2010–15. We find that (1) average total cost inefficiency is 14%, and that a it is mainly due to temporary inefficiency, (2) that work load units have the largest cost–output elasticity (+0.31%), (3) that price of airport services has the largest cost-input elasticity (+0.50%) while labor has a +0.41% cost elasticity and capital only a +0.09% cost elasticity. There is also evidence of economies of scale. Moreover we find that LCCs reduce both types of inefficiency and that private airports are more cost efficient than public ones. These findings have interesting managerial (e.g., strictly monitoring service costs, expand LCCs flights) and policy (e.g., provide incentive to reduce temporary inefficiency, push airport privatization) implications.

Martini, G., Scotti, D., Viola, D., Vittadini, G. (2020). Persistent and temporary inefficiiency in airport cost function: An application to Italy. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH. PART A, POLICY AND PRACTICE, 132, 999-1019 [10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.016].

Persistent and temporary inefficiiency in airport cost function: An application to Italy

Vittadini, G.
2020

Abstract

We study an airport cost function with a four-random components stochastic frontier model that split the inefficiency in two parts: (1) persistent (long-run) and (2) temporary (short-run). We analyze as determinant of both inefficiency types several exogenous factors such as the airport ownership and LCCs share. We apply the model to the Italian airport system during the period 2010–15. We find that (1) average total cost inefficiency is 14%, and that a it is mainly due to temporary inefficiency, (2) that work load units have the largest cost–output elasticity (+0.31%), (3) that price of airport services has the largest cost-input elasticity (+0.50%) while labor has a +0.41% cost elasticity and capital only a +0.09% cost elasticity. There is also evidence of economies of scale. Moreover we find that LCCs reduce both types of inefficiency and that private airports are more cost efficient than public ones. These findings have interesting managerial (e.g., strictly monitoring service costs, expand LCCs flights) and policy (e.g., provide incentive to reduce temporary inefficiency, push airport privatization) implications.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Airport persistent and transient inefficiency, Determinants of inefficiency, Closed Skew Normal stochastic frontier
English
16-gen-2020
2020
132
999
1019
reserved
Martini, G., Scotti, D., Viola, D., Vittadini, G. (2020). Persistent and temporary inefficiiency in airport cost function: An application to Italy. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH. PART A, POLICY AND PRACTICE, 132, 999-1019 [10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.016].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martini-2020-Transp Res A-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.19 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/257995
Citazioni
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
Social impact