Empirical research had initially shown that English listeners are able to identify the speakers' sexual orientation based on voice cues alone. However, the accuracy of this voicebased categorization, as well as its generalizability to other languages (language-dependency) and to non-native speakers (language-specificity), has been questioned recently. Consequently, we address these open issues in 5 experiments: First, we tested whether Italian and German listeners are able to correctly identify sexual orientation of same-language male speakers. Then, participants of both nationalities listened to voice samples and rated the sexual orientation of both Italian and German male speakers. We found that listeners were unable to identify the speakers' sexual orientation correctly. However, speakers were consistently categorized as either heterosexual or gay on the basis of how they sounded. Moreover, a similar pattern of results emerged when listeners judged the sexual orientation of speakers of their own and of the foreign language. Overall, this research suggests that voice-based categorization of sexual orientation reflects the listeners' expectations of how gay voices sound rather than being an accurate detector of the speakers' actual sexual identity. Results are discussed with regard to accuracy, acoustic features of voices, language dependency and language specificity.

Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M., Vespignani, F., Eyssel, F., et al. (2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers' sexual orientation within and across languages. PLOS ONE, 10(7), 1-38 [10.1371/journal.pone.0128882].

The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers' sexual orientation within and across languages

Sulpizio, Simone;Fasoli, Fabio;
2015

Abstract

Empirical research had initially shown that English listeners are able to identify the speakers' sexual orientation based on voice cues alone. However, the accuracy of this voicebased categorization, as well as its generalizability to other languages (language-dependency) and to non-native speakers (language-specificity), has been questioned recently. Consequently, we address these open issues in 5 experiments: First, we tested whether Italian and German listeners are able to correctly identify sexual orientation of same-language male speakers. Then, participants of both nationalities listened to voice samples and rated the sexual orientation of both Italian and German male speakers. We found that listeners were unable to identify the speakers' sexual orientation correctly. However, speakers were consistently categorized as either heterosexual or gay on the basis of how they sounded. Moreover, a similar pattern of results emerged when listeners judged the sexual orientation of speakers of their own and of the foreign language. Overall, this research suggests that voice-based categorization of sexual orientation reflects the listeners' expectations of how gay voices sound rather than being an accurate detector of the speakers' actual sexual identity. Results are discussed with regard to accuracy, acoustic features of voices, language dependency and language specificity.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all); Biochemistry; Genetics and Molecular Biology (all); Medicine (all)
English
2015
10
7
1
38
e0128882
reserved
Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M., Vespignani, F., Eyssel, F., et al. (2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers' sexual orientation within and across languages. PLOS ONE, 10(7), 1-38 [10.1371/journal.pone.0128882].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pone.0128882.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 2.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.01 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/250194
Citazioni
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
Social impact