We analize a market in the process of liberalization. Consumers are biased in favor of the incumbent firm and we assume that they can discover the true value of new suppliers only by switching. In an infinitely-repeated game setting with Bertrand competition, we first show that efficient entry might not take place. We then evaluate the effect of organizing a public auction for assigning consumers to a “default supplier” and show that such a mechanism (which respects the freedom of choice by consumers) would support entry efficiency. However, auctioning might also increase inefficient, although temporary, entry.
Bertoletti, P., Poletti, C. (2012). Debiasing through auction? Inertia in the liberalization of retail markets [Working paper].
Debiasing through auction? Inertia in the liberalization of retail markets
Bertoletti, P;
2012
Abstract
We analize a market in the process of liberalization. Consumers are biased in favor of the incumbent firm and we assume that they can discover the true value of new suppliers only by switching. In an infinitely-repeated game setting with Bertrand competition, we first show that efficient entry might not take place. We then evaluate the effect of organizing a public auction for assigning consumers to a “default supplier” and show that such a mechanism (which respects the freedom of choice by consumers) would support entry efficiency. However, auctioning might also increase inefficient, although temporary, entry.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IEFE47-2012.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Dimensione
759.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
759.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.