Background: Plasma and serum are the most widely used matrices in clinical studies. However, some variability in absolute concentrations of metabolites are likely to be observed in these collection tubes matrices. Methods: We analyzed 189 metabolites using the same protocol for quantitative targeted metabolomics (LC-MS/MS AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit Biocrates) in three types of samples, serum, plasma EDTA and citrate, of 80 subjects from the Cooperative Health Research In South Tyrol cohort (40 healthy elderly and 40 healthy young). Results: The concentration levels were higher in serum than citrate and EDTA, in particular for amino acids and biogenic amines. The average Pearson's correlation coefficients were however always higher than 0.7 for these two classes of metabolites. We could also demonstrate that blank EDTA vacutainer tubes contain a significant amount of sarcosine. Finally, we compared the metabolome of young people against elderly subjects and found that the highest number of metabolites significantly changing with age was detected in serum. Conclusion: Serum samples provide higher sensitivity for biomarker discovery studies. Due to the presence of spurious amount of sarcosine in vacutainer EDTA tubes, plasma EDTA is not suitable for studies requiring accurate quantification of sarcosine.

Paglia, G., Del Greco, F., Sigurdsson, B., Rainer, J., Volani, C., Hicks, A., et al. (2018). Influence of collection tubes during quantitative targeted metabolomics studies in human blood samples. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 486, 320-328 [10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.014].

Influence of collection tubes during quantitative targeted metabolomics studies in human blood samples

Paglia G.
Primo
;
2018

Abstract

Background: Plasma and serum are the most widely used matrices in clinical studies. However, some variability in absolute concentrations of metabolites are likely to be observed in these collection tubes matrices. Methods: We analyzed 189 metabolites using the same protocol for quantitative targeted metabolomics (LC-MS/MS AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit Biocrates) in three types of samples, serum, plasma EDTA and citrate, of 80 subjects from the Cooperative Health Research In South Tyrol cohort (40 healthy elderly and 40 healthy young). Results: The concentration levels were higher in serum than citrate and EDTA, in particular for amino acids and biogenic amines. The average Pearson's correlation coefficients were however always higher than 0.7 for these two classes of metabolites. We could also demonstrate that blank EDTA vacutainer tubes contain a significant amount of sarcosine. Finally, we compared the metabolome of young people against elderly subjects and found that the highest number of metabolites significantly changing with age was detected in serum. Conclusion: Serum samples provide higher sensitivity for biomarker discovery studies. Due to the presence of spurious amount of sarcosine in vacutainer EDTA tubes, plasma EDTA is not suitable for studies requiring accurate quantification of sarcosine.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit biocrates; Plasma citrate; Plasma EDTA; Sarcosine; Serum; Targeted metabolomics;
AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit biocrates; Plasma citrate; Plasma EDTA; Sarcosine; Serum; Targeted metabolomics; Amines; Biomarkers; Chromatography, Liquid; Citric Acid; Edetic Acid; Humans; Sarcosine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Blood Specimen Collection; Equipment Contamination; Metabolomics
English
2018
486
320
328
none
Paglia, G., Del Greco, F., Sigurdsson, B., Rainer, J., Volani, C., Hicks, A., et al. (2018). Influence of collection tubes during quantitative targeted metabolomics studies in human blood samples. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 486, 320-328 [10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.014].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/244199
Citazioni
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
Social impact