This thesis is deeply connected with the will of investigating the reflective, heuristic and transformative potential of the embodied dimension in teaching and learning processes. For this purpose, I engaged a group of Primary School teachers in a participatory research focused on their personal way of embodying teaching practices (embodied teaching) starting from a specific body activation (Experiential Anatomy). My research question was twofold. At a methodological level I was interested in interrogating the embodied teaching (Bresler 2014) of school professionals, namely their own way of performing the teaching/learning processes. At a thematic level the question was: what does it happen when a researcher activate a reflective process on professional practices of a group of primary school teachers through body activations? My main theoretical frame is represented by Embodied Pedagogy (Gamelli, 2011) and my fundamental epistemological reference is the so-called “embodiment paradigm”. This paradigm is a generative common ground for studies and practices connected to heterogeneous fields as cognitive sciences (Varela, Thompson and Rosch, 1991), performative disciplines (Farnell, 1995; Sheets-Johnstone, 1999; Bresler, 2014) and education (Gamelli, 2011; Rossi, 2017). My research perspective lies exactly at the crossroads of these three main areas. The empirical part of my research took place in a Primary School of Milan. I addressed a group of teachers with a research proposal structured on six meetings of three hours each. The research setting was designed in a way that allowed a multi-layered experience of the body activations in order to let each participant explore her own embodied teaching, namely her own personal way of performing teaching. The “co-operative inquiry” theorized by Heron and Reason (1997) and Formenti’s “Spyral of knowledge” (2009) were the two main epistemological pivots in reflecting on the research objectives, as they both advance the idea of research as a co-construction of participatory knowledge. They were also fundamental in order to design the internal structure of each meeting consistently with my theoretical assumptions. Experiental Anatomy of Body-Mind Centering was the somatic practice that I used for the empirical part. Each meeting was audio-recorded and transcribed. After a first thematic analysis with Nvivo I decided to turn my research in a performative direction. This change of perspective required the creation of a detailed embodied research method. This is the most original part of my thesis that consisted in a performative analysis of a selection of collected data (originated in the six meetings with the participants) in the form of textual and audio excerpts. This performative analysis, documented by 160 video shootings, ended in the creation of a video-performance that was used as a starting point of the final meeting with research participants. The use of this aestethic and performative object in the research setting revealed itself as a powerful tool in order to trigger an high level of participation in the group. The final meeting, in fact, was a fundamental moment as the participants’ reflections transformed “my” performative composition in a shared knowledge connected with all the research process. The results were very interesting both in terms of new questions raised by the teachers and of future research possibilities in the direction of embodied teaching.
Questo lavoro di ricerca nasce dal desiderio di indagare il potenziale riflessivo, euristico e trasformativo della dimensione embodied nei processi di insegnamento/apprendimento. Per farlo ha interrogato un gruppo di insegnanti della scuola primaria, coinvolgendole in una ricerca partecipativa sulle proprie pratiche di insegnamento e sul loro modo unico di incarnarle (embodied teaching), a partire da un’attivazione corporea specifica (Anatomia Esperienziale). La mia domanda di ricerca si è orientata in due direzioni. Ad un livello metodologico potrebbe essere formulata nel seguente modo: come interrogare l’embodied teaching (Bresler, 2014) di professionisti della scuola, cioè il modo incarnato di interpretare il processo di insegnamento/apprendimento? Ad un livello tematico, invece, l’interrogativo di fondo potrebbe essere così posto: cosa emerge quando si va ad attivare un processo di riflessione sulla pratica professionale di un gruppo di insegnanti della scuola primaria a partire da un’interrogazione che passa dalla percezione e dall’attivazione corporea? Collocandomi nell’area di ricerca della Pedagogia del corpo (Gamelli, 2011), il macro-paradigma dell’embodiment ha rappresentato un riferimento epistemologico importante per il lavoro. In esso ho trovato un fertile incontro di studi, ricerche e pratiche provenienti da ambiti molto distanti, tra cui le scienze cognitive (l’enactive embodiment di Varela, Thompson, Rosch, 1991), l’ambito performativo (Farnell, 1995; Sheets-Johnstone, 1999; Bresler, 2014) e quello più legato all’educazione (Gamelli, 2011; Rossi, 2017). È precisamente all’incontro di queste tre aree che si colloca la prospettiva di ricerca del presente lavoro. La parte empirica della ricerca si è svolta con un gruppo di sette insegnanti di una scuola primaria milanese, su adesione volontaria, in sei incontri di tre ore circa ciascuno. Il setting di ricerca è stato strutturato in modo che ci fosse una stratificazione dell’esperienza corporea proposta affinchè ognuna delle partecipanti potesse contattare il proprio embodied teaching nel rispetto del proprio stile personale e corporeo di insegnamento. La metodologia della “co-operative-inquiry” (Heron, Reason, 1997) e la successiva interpretazione di Formenti nella “spirale della conoscenza” (Formenti, 2009), oltre che fornirmi un riferimento epistemologico in termini di dimensione partecipata della conoscenza, mi hanno fornito riferimenti importanti per disegnare la struttura interna degli incontri in modo coerente con i miei presupposti teorici. L’anatomia esperienziale del Body-Mind Centering è stata la pratica somatica che ho utilizzato per la ricerca empirica. Tutti gli incontri sono stati audioregistrati e trascritti. Dopo una prima analisi tematica attraverso NVivo, è maturata la decisione di andare verso una svolta più performativa della mia ricerca. Questo cambio di prospettiva ha richiesto l’ideazione e la costruzione di un dettagliato – e inedito – metodo di ricerca embodied. Si tratta di uno dei passaggi più originali della mia ricerca di dottorato, che ha visto l’inizio di un lavoro di analisi corporea e performativa dei dati attraverso segmenti audio e testuali che ho selezionato dalle trascrizioni e dai materiali audio degli incontri con le insegnanti. Questa analisi performativa, documentata in 160 riprese video, si è poi direzionata verso la creazione di una video-performance utilizzata come restituzione alle insegnanti rilanciandolo e aprendo nuovi interrogativi e così possibili sviluppi per ricerche future legate alla dimensione corporea della professione insegnante.
(2018). EMBODIED TEACHING: PROSPETTIVE DI RICERCA A SCUOLA ATTRAVERSO L'ANATOMIA ESPERIENZIALE. (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2018).
EMBODIED TEACHING: PROSPETTIVE DI RICERCA A SCUOLA ATTRAVERSO L'ANATOMIA ESPERIENZIALE
FERRI, NICOLETTA
2018
Abstract
This thesis is deeply connected with the will of investigating the reflective, heuristic and transformative potential of the embodied dimension in teaching and learning processes. For this purpose, I engaged a group of Primary School teachers in a participatory research focused on their personal way of embodying teaching practices (embodied teaching) starting from a specific body activation (Experiential Anatomy). My research question was twofold. At a methodological level I was interested in interrogating the embodied teaching (Bresler 2014) of school professionals, namely their own way of performing the teaching/learning processes. At a thematic level the question was: what does it happen when a researcher activate a reflective process on professional practices of a group of primary school teachers through body activations? My main theoretical frame is represented by Embodied Pedagogy (Gamelli, 2011) and my fundamental epistemological reference is the so-called “embodiment paradigm”. This paradigm is a generative common ground for studies and practices connected to heterogeneous fields as cognitive sciences (Varela, Thompson and Rosch, 1991), performative disciplines (Farnell, 1995; Sheets-Johnstone, 1999; Bresler, 2014) and education (Gamelli, 2011; Rossi, 2017). My research perspective lies exactly at the crossroads of these three main areas. The empirical part of my research took place in a Primary School of Milan. I addressed a group of teachers with a research proposal structured on six meetings of three hours each. The research setting was designed in a way that allowed a multi-layered experience of the body activations in order to let each participant explore her own embodied teaching, namely her own personal way of performing teaching. The “co-operative inquiry” theorized by Heron and Reason (1997) and Formenti’s “Spyral of knowledge” (2009) were the two main epistemological pivots in reflecting on the research objectives, as they both advance the idea of research as a co-construction of participatory knowledge. They were also fundamental in order to design the internal structure of each meeting consistently with my theoretical assumptions. Experiental Anatomy of Body-Mind Centering was the somatic practice that I used for the empirical part. Each meeting was audio-recorded and transcribed. After a first thematic analysis with Nvivo I decided to turn my research in a performative direction. This change of perspective required the creation of a detailed embodied research method. This is the most original part of my thesis that consisted in a performative analysis of a selection of collected data (originated in the six meetings with the participants) in the form of textual and audio excerpts. This performative analysis, documented by 160 video shootings, ended in the creation of a video-performance that was used as a starting point of the final meeting with research participants. The use of this aestethic and performative object in the research setting revealed itself as a powerful tool in order to trigger an high level of participation in the group. The final meeting, in fact, was a fundamental moment as the participants’ reflections transformed “my” performative composition in a shared knowledge connected with all the research process. The results were very interesting both in terms of new questions raised by the teachers and of future research possibilities in the direction of embodied teaching.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
phd_unimib_798799.pdf
Accesso Aperto
Descrizione: tesi di dottorato
Dimensione
3.6 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.6 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.