Background: Telomere integrity in budding yeast depends on the CST (Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1) and shelterin-like (Rap1-Rif1-Rif2) complexes, which are thought to act independently from each other. Methodology: Here we show that a specific functional interaction indeed exists among components of the two complexes. In particular, unlike RIF2 deletion, the lack of Rif1 is lethal for stn1ΔC cells and causes a dramatic reduction in viability of cdc13-1 and cdc13-5 mutants. This synthetic interaction between Rif1 and the CST complex occurs independently of rif1Δ-induced alterations in telomere length. Both cdc13-1 rif1Δ and cdc13-5 rif1Δ cells display very high amounts of telomeric singlestranded DNA and DNA damage checkpoint activation, indicating that severe defects in telomere integrity cause their loss of viability. In agreement with this hypothesis, both DNA damage checkpoint activation and lethality in cdc13 rif1Δ cells are partially counteracted by the lack of the Exo1 nuclease, which is involved in telomeric single-stranded DNA generation. The functional interaction between Rif1 and the CST complex is specific, because RIF1 deletion does not enhance checkpoint activation in case of CST-independent telomere capping deficiencies, such as those caused by the absence of Yku or telomerase. Significance: Thus, these data highlight a novel role for Rif1 in assisting the essential telomere protection function of the CST complex.

Anbalagan, S., Bonetti, D., Lucchini, G., Longhese, M. (2011). Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping. PLOS GENETICS, 7(3), e1002024 [10.1371/journal.pgen.1002024].

Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping

ANBALAGAN, SAVANI
Primo
;
BONETTI, DIEGO
Secondo
;
LUCCHINI, GIOVANNA;LONGHESE, MARIA PIA
2011

Abstract

Background: Telomere integrity in budding yeast depends on the CST (Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1) and shelterin-like (Rap1-Rif1-Rif2) complexes, which are thought to act independently from each other. Methodology: Here we show that a specific functional interaction indeed exists among components of the two complexes. In particular, unlike RIF2 deletion, the lack of Rif1 is lethal for stn1ΔC cells and causes a dramatic reduction in viability of cdc13-1 and cdc13-5 mutants. This synthetic interaction between Rif1 and the CST complex occurs independently of rif1Δ-induced alterations in telomere length. Both cdc13-1 rif1Δ and cdc13-5 rif1Δ cells display very high amounts of telomeric singlestranded DNA and DNA damage checkpoint activation, indicating that severe defects in telomere integrity cause their loss of viability. In agreement with this hypothesis, both DNA damage checkpoint activation and lethality in cdc13 rif1Δ cells are partially counteracted by the lack of the Exo1 nuclease, which is involved in telomeric single-stranded DNA generation. The functional interaction between Rif1 and the CST complex is specific, because RIF1 deletion does not enhance checkpoint activation in case of CST-independent telomere capping deficiencies, such as those caused by the absence of Yku or telomerase. Significance: Thus, these data highlight a novel role for Rif1 in assisting the essential telomere protection function of the CST complex.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
telomere protection; shelterin; CST complex
English
2011
7
3
e1002024
e1002024
open
Anbalagan, S., Bonetti, D., Lucchini, G., Longhese, M. (2011). Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping. PLOS GENETICS, 7(3), e1002024 [10.1371/journal.pgen.1002024].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pgen.1002024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/19895
Citazioni
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
Social impact