Rationale: Because encouraging rates for hospital and long-term survival of immunocompromised patients in ICUs have been described, these patients are more likely to receive invasive therapies, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Objectives: To report outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to identify their pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality and main ECMO-related complications. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study in 10 international ICUs with high volumes of ECMO cases. Immunocompromised patients, defined as having hematological malignancies, active solid tumor, solid-organ transplant, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or long-term or high-dose corticosteroid or immunosuppressant use, and severe ECMO-treated ARDS, from 2008 to 2015 were included. Measurements and Main Results: We collected demographics, clinical data, ECMO-related complications, and ICU- and 6 month–outcome data for 203 patients (median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 28 [25th–75th percentile, 20–33]; age, 51 [38–59] yr; PaO2/FIO2, 60 [50–82] mm Hg before ECMO) who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Six-month survival was only 30%, with a respective median ECMO duration and ICU stay of 8 (5–14) and 25 (16–50) days. Patients with hematological malignancies had significantly poorer outcomes than others (log-rank P = 0.02). ECMO-related major bleeding, cannula infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia were frequent (36%, 10%, and 50%, respectively). Multivariate analyses retained fewer than 30 days between immunodeficiency diagnosis and ECMO cannulation as being associated with lower 6-month mortality (odds ratio, 0.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.66]; P = 0.002), and lower platelet count, higher PCO2, age, and driving pressure as independent pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality. Conclusions: Recently diagnosed immunodeficiency is associated with a much better prognosis in ECMO-treated severe ARDS. However, low 6-month survival of our large cohort of immunocompromised patients supports restricting ECMO to patients with realistic oncological/therapeutic prognoses, acceptable functional status, and few pre-ECMO mortality-risk factors

Schmidt, M., Schellongowski, P., Patroniti, N., Taccone, F., Reis Miranda, D., Reuter, J., et al. (2018). Six-Month Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rescued by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 197(10), 1297-1307 [10.1164/rccm.201708-1761OC].

Six-Month Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rescued by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. An International Multicenter Retrospective Study

Patroniti, N;Crippa, IA;
2018

Abstract

Rationale: Because encouraging rates for hospital and long-term survival of immunocompromised patients in ICUs have been described, these patients are more likely to receive invasive therapies, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Objectives: To report outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to identify their pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality and main ECMO-related complications. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study in 10 international ICUs with high volumes of ECMO cases. Immunocompromised patients, defined as having hematological malignancies, active solid tumor, solid-organ transplant, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or long-term or high-dose corticosteroid or immunosuppressant use, and severe ECMO-treated ARDS, from 2008 to 2015 were included. Measurements and Main Results: We collected demographics, clinical data, ECMO-related complications, and ICU- and 6 month–outcome data for 203 patients (median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 28 [25th–75th percentile, 20–33]; age, 51 [38–59] yr; PaO2/FIO2, 60 [50–82] mm Hg before ECMO) who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Six-month survival was only 30%, with a respective median ECMO duration and ICU stay of 8 (5–14) and 25 (16–50) days. Patients with hematological malignancies had significantly poorer outcomes than others (log-rank P = 0.02). ECMO-related major bleeding, cannula infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia were frequent (36%, 10%, and 50%, respectively). Multivariate analyses retained fewer than 30 days between immunodeficiency diagnosis and ECMO cannulation as being associated with lower 6-month mortality (odds ratio, 0.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.66]; P = 0.002), and lower platelet count, higher PCO2, age, and driving pressure as independent pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality. Conclusions: Recently diagnosed immunodeficiency is associated with a much better prognosis in ECMO-treated severe ARDS. However, low 6-month survival of our large cohort of immunocompromised patients supports restricting ECMO to patients with realistic oncological/therapeutic prognoses, acceptable functional status, and few pre-ECMO mortality-risk factors
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; acute respiratory distress syndrome; immunodeficiency; outcome; hematological malignancies
English
2018
197
10
1297
1307
none
Schmidt, M., Schellongowski, P., Patroniti, N., Taccone, F., Reis Miranda, D., Reuter, J., et al. (2018). Six-Month Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rescued by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 197(10), 1297-1307 [10.1164/rccm.201708-1761OC].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/189937
Citazioni
  • Scopus 96
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 76
Social impact