Objectives: Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) are broadly studied in high-income countries, but data concerning their functioning are lacking in developing countries. Therefore, we analyzed their reliability and sensitivity to change in children with cerebral palsy in Tanzania. Methods: GMFCS and MACS are two ordinal grading systems used to assess motor functions while observing children’s performances. Forty-nine children were classified by two independent physiotherapy students at baseline, after one month and after one year. Reliability and sensitivity to change were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), effect size (ES), standard response mean (SRM), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: Inter- (ICC = 0.97/0.95 for GMFCS/MACS) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98/0.96 GMFCS/MACS) were excellent. Sensitivity to change was small (ES = −0.14/0.11, SRM = −0.24;/0.24 GMFCS/MACS). SEM was 0.2 points, resulting in MDC = 0.5/0.7 for GMFCS/MACS, respectively. Conclusions: GMFCS and MACS demonstrated excellent reliability, but not sensitivity to change.

Piscitelli, D., Vercelli, S., Meroni, R., Zagnoni, G., Pellicciari, L. (2019). Reliability of the gross motor function classification system and the manual ability classification system in children with cerebral palsy in Tanzania. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 22(2), 80-86 [10.1080/17518423.2017.1342710].

Reliability of the gross motor function classification system and the manual ability classification system in children with cerebral palsy in Tanzania

Piscitelli, D
Primo
;
Meroni, R;
2019

Abstract

Objectives: Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) are broadly studied in high-income countries, but data concerning their functioning are lacking in developing countries. Therefore, we analyzed their reliability and sensitivity to change in children with cerebral palsy in Tanzania. Methods: GMFCS and MACS are two ordinal grading systems used to assess motor functions while observing children’s performances. Forty-nine children were classified by two independent physiotherapy students at baseline, after one month and after one year. Reliability and sensitivity to change were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), effect size (ES), standard response mean (SRM), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: Inter- (ICC = 0.97/0.95 for GMFCS/MACS) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98/0.96 GMFCS/MACS) were excellent. Sensitivity to change was small (ES = −0.14/0.11, SRM = −0.24;/0.24 GMFCS/MACS). SEM was 0.2 points, resulting in MDC = 0.5/0.7 for GMFCS/MACS, respectively. Conclusions: GMFCS and MACS demonstrated excellent reliability, but not sensitivity to change.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Cerebral palsy; developing countries; gross motor function; outcome assessment; psychometrics;
English
10-lug-2017
2019
22
2
80
86
none
Piscitelli, D., Vercelli, S., Meroni, R., Zagnoni, G., Pellicciari, L. (2019). Reliability of the gross motor function classification system and the manual ability classification system in children with cerebral palsy in Tanzania. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 22(2), 80-86 [10.1080/17518423.2017.1342710].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/189061
Citazioni
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
Social impact