This study explicitly elucidates the relationship between litigation and access to justice. In considering access issues, this study shows that the effects of policies affecting partiesâ litigation decisions partially depart from those in the standard literature. For instance, increasing partiesâ litigation costs does not necessarily promote settlement. Rather, the effects depend on the elasticity of the demand for legal remedies. Furthermore, even while pushing litigation, enhancing access to justice is efficient as long as the claimantâs marginal propensity to litigate is smaller than the social opportunity-cost of access to justice. This finding offers further insight into the suitability of litigation subsidization
Saraceno, M. (2018). Justice: Greater Access, Lower Costs. ITALIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 4(2), 283-312 [10.1007/s40797-017-0059-x].
Justice: Greater Access, Lower Costs
Saraceno, M
2018
Abstract
This study explicitly elucidates the relationship between litigation and access to justice. In considering access issues, this study shows that the effects of policies affecting partiesâ litigation decisions partially depart from those in the standard literature. For instance, increasing partiesâ litigation costs does not necessarily promote settlement. Rather, the effects depend on the elasticity of the demand for legal remedies. Furthermore, even while pushing litigation, enhancing access to justice is efficient as long as the claimantâs marginal propensity to litigate is smaller than the social opportunity-cost of access to justice. This finding offers further insight into the suitability of litigation subsidizationI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.