Background and Objectives: Since significant differences have been reported, we estimated agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Methods: We assessed 327 outpatients (mean age: 45.2 ± 13.4) with depressive or anxiety disorders. Results: Absolute differences in prevalence rates between DSM-5 and DSM-IV AUD ranged from −1.1% (subjects with anxiety disorders) to +1.8% (tobacco smokers). The agreement was excellent (k = 0.88), also accounting for specific subgroups (relevant k coefficients >0.80). Discussion and Conclusions: DSM-5 criteria did not inflate AUD rates. Scientific Significance: Our results have epidemiological significance since, unlike previous reports, we found diagnostic stability between new and old AUD criteria in this clinical population. (Am J Addict 2017;26:53–56).
Bartoli, F., Carra', G., Biagi, E., Crocamo, C., Dakanalis, A., Di Carlo, F., et al. (2017). Agreement between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder among outpatients suffering from depressive and anxiety disorders. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 26(1), 53-56 [10.1111/ajad.12482].
Agreement between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder among outpatients suffering from depressive and anxiety disorders
BARTOLI, FRANCESCO
Primo
;CARRA', GIUSEPPESecondo
;CROCAMO, CRISTINA;DAKANALIS, ANTONIOS;di GIACOMO, ESTER;MADEDDU, FABIO;CLERICI, MASSIMOUltimo
2017
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Since significant differences have been reported, we estimated agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Methods: We assessed 327 outpatients (mean age: 45.2 ± 13.4) with depressive or anxiety disorders. Results: Absolute differences in prevalence rates between DSM-5 and DSM-IV AUD ranged from −1.1% (subjects with anxiety disorders) to +1.8% (tobacco smokers). The agreement was excellent (k = 0.88), also accounting for specific subgroups (relevant k coefficients >0.80). Discussion and Conclusions: DSM-5 criteria did not inflate AUD rates. Scientific Significance: Our results have epidemiological significance since, unlike previous reports, we found diagnostic stability between new and old AUD criteria in this clinical population. (Am J Addict 2017;26:53–56).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.